From Voice ~ Topics: lifestyle, professional development

Where’s the Finish Line? Examining Success in Design

Paris Hilton is a superstar. This celebrity icon is best known for her role on The Simple Life television series and the scandalous sex tape that made its way around the internet. Her rise to stardom has taken the route followed by many famous socialites—her fame and success are accidental and inherited.

Just a year younger than Hilton, Natalie Portman, 28, is an actor who has achieved both celebrity status and professional success. Portman has been a prominent actor since her childhood. She took a brief break from performing to complete her degree in psychology from Harvard in 2003, and then pursued graduate coursework. She is both an artist and a scholar and has worked to produce quality work in both roles.

Most professions have their own versions of success. These include, in some form, wealth, recognition, awards, speaking engagements, publishing deals and more. Our culture has grown accustomed to these models and expects nothing less.

Driving our admiration is the desire to author our own success, especially if it can parallel the stardom we are so used to seeing and reading about in tabloids—online and off. In mainstream culture, celebrity and success are far from synonymous. Celebrity can be attained for arbitrary reasons, as we have witnessed with Paris Hilton—fame does not necessarily stem from professional achievement or even personal satisfaction.

In graphic design, however, this is not the case. Design’s celebrities have earned notoriety as a result of their success—for their body of work in the service of clients. Their stardom reflects the quality of work they produce as well as their ambition to succeed.

Our celebrities, like most, are easy to recognize—at least within the confines of the graphic design community. They appear often in the industry’s standard publications being lauded for this project or that. They are the keynote speakers at major conferences and events. They are the subjects of documentaries and books. We hold their work up to high standards and we are quick to criticize them when those standards are not met. These design idols are the leaders of our profession, setting trends and providing the critical discourse that becomes the backbone of much of what we do and what we think about. And like the demographic of the audiences they inspire and influence, these designers run the full range of ages.

This last observation is reassuring. The community of graphic designers is getting bigger, with a larger number of young practitioners whose skills surpass their experience. As business schools begin to understand the importance of design and adopt our model of “design thinking,” we will be facing a more competitive and specialized collective than ever before. We face more pressure to achieve and succeed at an earlier stage of our lives. Like most mainstream celebrities, who risk being considered “washed up” when entering their 40s, young designers feel like failures if they don’t get early public recognition. Thinking like this is a sure way to end up burned out and disillusioned.

Malcolm Gladwell’s recent bestseller Outliers explores how people manage to achieve greatness in various fields of endeavor. Gladwell’s research reveals that “genius” doesn’t only come to brilliant young prodigies (like Picasso), but is also attained by people who plod along for decades (like Cezanne). Today’s youth-obsessed culture tends to focus on young upstarts and new talent, but designers achieve success across ages and generations.

David Reinfurt is a critical thinker and maker. Those who don’t know his name might have read his ideas while thumbing the pages of Dot Dot Dot—an underground magazine published by his workshop and bookstore Dexter Sinister, which Reinfut runs with Stuart Bailey. Reinfurt has managed to blur the lines between the standard client-based studio practice with that of critical research and investigation into all areas of our field: print, web, interactive, video, installation and even performance. His work has transcended the sphere of mainstream graphic design to receive recognition by the international art world—and all this while in his mid-30s.

In contrast to Reinfurt’s quick start, Ed Fella’s career took years to germinate. The artist, educator, and graphic designer hails from Detroit, where he spent 30 years working in the advertising business before attending graduate school at Cranbrook. Fella received his MFA in 1987 at age 49 and has gone on to have a long and influential career while teaching at the California Institute of the Arts. In design culture he is widely known and revered for his playful typographic compositions.

Paula Scher entered the profession in the early 1970s, a time when when women faced the glass ceiling in nearly every corporate structure. She started at CBS records, moved to Epic, and then back at CBS as an art director. Her quick wit and thick skin served her well in the company of men. For Scher, design has always been about making. It has been about producing work and being challenged by that work. Considered one of the world’s most influential graphic designers, she has achieved a success and celebrity status that most of us dream about, and she has been able to do so over a long period of time while satisfying her internal desire to produce work that is unconventional, emotional, political, dimensional and poetic.

Marian Bantjes calls herself a “graphic artist,” and it is under this designation that she has gained an international reputation for ornamental type and organic lettering that brims with originality and brilliance. Prior to becoming the Bantjes we are all familiar with, she was, much like Fella, a working designer at a traditional agency in Vancouver, BC, Canada. In 2003 she left her conventional career behind and started a journey of redefinition—a journey that has lead her to immense accomplishment. When she redefined herself she was 40 years old.

The work of G. Dan Covert and Andre Andreev tells a different tale. Now 28 and 24, respectively, they operate the small studio, dress code, in New York City and have found themselves in the spotlight since the release of their book Never Sleep: Graduating to Graphic Design, published in April 2009. Energetic, exuberant, and loaded with everything from student projects to personal IM communications, Never Sleep is not a disciplined retrospective so much as the collective musings of two young guys who can’t believe how fast they got ahead after graduating. Dan and Andre are the new guys on the block and already enjoying success!

These designers represent the immense talent that can be found throughout our industry and at every point in the timeline—from rookies to veterans. While the aforementioned group may be touted as successes and celebrities, their achievements have been both internal and authored. Their models of success derived from not how much money they were going to make or who was going to give them the credit they deserved, but rather from how they were going to continue to produce work they believe in. Without this inherent belief in our work, our successes will be fleeting and disappointing.

---

thumbnail photo: APCortizasJr (iStockphoto)


About the Author: Justin Kropp is a graduate student in the department of graphic design at the Maryland Institute College of Art. His ongoing thesis research looks at the role semiotics plays in the evolving design practice and discourse.

  1. link to this comment by JT Tue Jun 16, 2009

    Well said Justin! I'm glad you got this up and published!

  2. link to this comment by Aaron Walser Wed Jun 17, 2009

    I appreciate this discourse on success vrs fame and its relevance in our profession. Upon reading it I was first drawn to the parallels of successful and famous sporting stars. You can't be famous unless you are successful in sports. Even Dennis Rodman was relatively successful as a player in addition to be famous for his audacity's. The comparison started to break down for me when I realized we don't have a design Superbowl or National Championship to cement our places in the designers hall of fame. :) So bringing it back to passion for creation and excellence in that pursuit at whatever age being inherit in how we define success was very insightful to me. Thank you for your article.

  3. link to this comment by Craig Schlanser Wed Jun 17, 2009

    Thanks to the films of Gary Hustwit, designers may be as close as they'll ever get to becoming real celebrities (however lowly a tier).

    But in the event that any "celebrity" designer gets too big for their britches, we'll just need someone like Christopher Guest to bring us down to earth w/ a scorching mockumentary.

  4. link to this comment by Jan Conradi Thu Jun 18, 2009

    I still think that design is a problem-solving activity; thus success is achieved by solving problems effectively and communicating messages clearly. It isn't "about you" but our celebrity-obsessed culture obscures that fact. The plethora of design competitions too often feeds the beast of style over substance. For every rock-star designer, there are multitudes whose bodies of work are equally strong or stronger.

    Let's keep our celebrations focused on significant work: clearly thought, carefully crafted, expertly installed. Let's get excited about design solutions that make the world a better place to live. Let's be slow and deliberate in bestowing honors to designers -- making recognition something meaningful to aspire to, not a brief flash of celebrity that only lasts until a next, more outrageous personality appears on the scene. Our recognition, like our work, should aim for lasting quality.

  5. link to this comment by Nicholas Latkovic Thu Jun 18, 2009

    With patience, experience. And with experience, success.

    Fallingwater (residence)
    Frank Lloyd Wright, 67

    The Old Man and the Sea (novel)
    Ernest Hemmingway, 53

    DC07 (vacuum)
    James Dyson, 54

    Futura (typeface)
    Paul Renner, 49

    Zapfino (typeface)
    Hermann Zapf, 80

    Best Actress (Academy Award)
    Jessica Tandy, 80

  6. link to this comment by Jennifer Di Palma Thu Jun 18, 2009

    Form, wealth, recognition, awards, speaking engagements, publishing deals...if young designers feel like failures because of a lack of public recognition, we are complete failures as design educators. You saved the only important point of this article for the second to last sentence about finding ways to produce ideas you believe in. If public recognition is a by-product because a body of people get on your idea train, that's great and more power to you. But it's not something I lose sleep over. An honest day's work is the only part that matters. Let the rest of the chips fall where they may.

  7. link to this comment by MJ Thu Jun 18, 2009

    I agree completely with Jennifer. I remember during my study, there was a lot of emphasis placed on these "rock star" designers. I used to feel like I wasn't successful as a designer unless I was receiving the same public accolades. I found that my work strengthened considerably after I let go of the idea of becoming a "rock star" myself. I guess it was like I finally gave myself permission to be me and not someone else.

    Overall in this industry, there needs to be more focus on effective ideas. I see too many submissions in annuals that are very pretty to look at but do not communicate clear ideas. However, I think the desire to be appreciated and admired by others is part of human nature (especially in an industry that even my own family barely understands! haha!)

  8. link to this comment by Dylan Kilgore Fri Jun 19, 2009

    Success is gained from the opportunity to work with other people. Even though not many people may know of my work, those that do know that it's really good. We as designers are the invisible wind that helps drive business forward.

  9. link to this comment by Sammie K Mon Jun 22, 2009

    I remember feeling immense joy and accomplishment with design. With every project completed and skill learned, I felt like I could solve the world's problems. And then when I graduated college, I lost sight of that sense of empowerment. It became a race; to find that ideal job, design the next big merchandising icon, and become that "design rockstar". Design began to taunt me when I didn't get the job interview or the call back. It's been a year since I've graduated, and I have nothing to show. I've put so much pressure on myself to succeed when my idea of success was crippling me. Today I say "No More!" Today I reclaim the passion for something that is rightfully mine!

    I have my whole life for "success". Right now I deserve happiness.

  10. link to this comment by Chris Tue Jun 23, 2009

    Very well put! Thank you for that, Justin. I have for many nights been woken by that lingering question, "when will I make a difference?" I always try to remind myself that it takes time, and it will come if I continue to follow the passion. It is difficult to drown the media-talk and common perceptions of success. I guess we are all trying our hardest.

    And so in August I follow my passion to MICA's GD MFA program at the tender age of 30, excited for the opportunity to dive in deeper.

  11. link to this comment by Juana Merlo Thu Jul 02, 2009

    Thank you for this. You made a very basic point I never realized. It is true then that all of our 'celebrities' are very smart, really ;)

    Congratulations for the publishing!!!

    Juana, a MICA GD student graduated in 2005.

  12. link to this comment by DesignFirms Fri Jul 03, 2009

    The politics in design are much like the politics in government and the way of the rest of the world - one's view is different from another. Some people like to sit down and create cool looking pieces of work because it is what they love to do while others are forced to do it the "politically correct" way and sell a product. Many designers aren't taught marketing and that is a problem. Most successful gurus today wear all the hats - program, design and market. If you are a designer that doesn't understand the other pieces, you will never be able to complete the puzzle as a whole.

Add a Comment

AIGA encourages thoughtful, responsible discourse. Please add comments judiciously, and refrain from maligning any individual, institution or body of work.
Read our policy on commenting.